Why compliance does not guarantee cyber resilience
The compliance-versus-resilience debate is evergreen, but with NIS2 and DORA demanding operational resilience evidence, European enterprises must close the gap between audit artefacts and tested incident-response capability.
Summary written by editorial AI · Source link below
Cyber security has become one of the most audited and regulated areas of enterprise technology. Yet an organisation can satisfy every requirement on paper and still discover, during a real incident, that its systems, people or processes are not ready for the pressure that follows. Compliance can demonstrate that controls have been put in place; […] The post Why compliance does not guarantee cyber resilience appeared first on IT Security Guru .
Editorial Analysis
As NIS2 and DORA enforcement begins, regulators will look beyond checkbox compliance; organisations that cannot demonstrate tested resilience face both regulatory and operational risk.
Schedule a resilience-focused tabletop exercise that targets gaps between documented controls and actual incident-response performance.
Passing audits is not the same as surviving an attack — upcoming EU regulations will penalise the difference.
Forward-looking interpretation drafted by editorial AI under human review — not a reproduction of the source. See methodology.
External link — opens at IT Security Guru in a new tab.
More from the Compliance Desk
- TikTok Agrees to $400 Million Settlement in U.S. Child Privacy Lawsuit22 Aug
- Do Privacy Policies Match with the Logs? An Empirical Study of Privacy Disclosure in Android Application Logs20 Aug
- Premier League Introduces Mandatory Cybersecurity Standards, Backed by Fines of Up to £100,00019 Aug
- A Control-Driven Framework for Secure SaaS Onboarding in Regulated Enterprises18 Aug
- Windows Server 2022 reaches end of mainstream support in 60 days17 Aug