Provable Compliance: A Protocol for Runtime Compliance Evidence and Transaction-Specific Decisioning
A proposed protocol generates transaction-specific, runtime compliance evidence—addressing the staleness problem in onboarding and screening data that regulators increasingly scrutinise under continuous-compliance expectations.
Summary written by editorial AI · Source link below
arXiv:2610.22913v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Regulated institutions already perform onboarding, screening, monitoring, and review, but compliance evidence ages, and whether it supports a decision depends on the institution, product, subject, counterparty, transaction, jurisdiction, risk tier, and purpose. A relying party therefore often cannot obtain compact, attributable proof of which evidence, policy, authority, and transaction context were current when a decision was made, a gap that gro
Editorial Analysis
Under DORA and NIS2's continuous-compliance expectations, static compliance snapshots are becoming insufficient; runtime evidence per transaction could set a new operational standard.
Assess whether your compliance-evidence lifecycle can produce transaction-level freshness, and plan a pilot of runtime compliance-evidence generation for high-risk transaction types.
Forward-looking interpretation drafted by editorial AI under human review — not a reproduction of the source. See methodology.
External link — opens at arXiv Crypto & Security in a new tab.
More from the Compliance Desk
- Google Says Gmail and Photos Data Shared With AI Search Could Be Used for Targeted Ads2d
- 23andMe successor settles with California for $6 million over cybersecurity failings6d
- WhatsApp Hid Instructions in Help Pages Telling Its AI Chatbot Not to Recommend Privacy Regulators6d
- SoK: Failure Modes in Common Criteria Product Evaluation - A Taxonomy and Design-for-Evaluability Guidance9 Oct
- Lawmakers warn Google could expose Spirit Airlines data in $10 million AI training deal8 Oct