Beyond Policy Engines: Binding-Complete Execution Admission
Paper formalises the gap between a policy engine's ALLOW verdict and truly governance-complete execution admission, arguing that context binding and governance-source participation require explicit verification beyond current engines.
Summary written by editorial AI · Source link below
arXiv:2610.29701v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Policy engines determine whether evaluated policies permit a request, but a correct ALLOW decision does not establish complete governance-source participation, exact context binding, or sufficient grounds for execution admission. This paper examines the gap between policy evaluation and execution admission. We introduce the Binding-Complete Execution Admission Contract (BCEAC), a governance-relative contract for independently determined source obl
Editorial Analysis
Enterprises relying on policy engines for zero-trust enforcement may have blind spots where an ALLOW decision does not guarantee complete governance coverage.
Forward-looking interpretation drafted by editorial AI under human review — not a reproduction of the source. See methodology.
External link — opens at arXiv Crypto & Security in a new tab.
More from the Research Desk
- Signed, Sealed, and Relayed, NTLM-style: Bypassing LDAP Signing Through Reauthentication3d
- Not Where You Think: Protecting Location Privacy Against Reasoning-Based Geolocation4d
- Social-HUMINT: An LLM-Augmented Unified Framework for Measuring Social Media Exposure4d
- Practical Auditing of Differentially Private Graph Release Mechanisms: Methodology, Toolkit, and Case Study4d
- SecLog-Bench: A Scalable Benchmark for Cybersecurity Log Reasoning with Scaffolded Evidence4d